How Trump’s ‘Original Oil Guy’ Boosted US-Israel Ties and Played Down Risks of Iran War

Harold Hamm, an 80-year-old oil tycoon and “original oil guy” to Donald Trump, has played a significant role in shaping US policy on Iran and the Middle East. His influence extends beyond personal relationships with Trump, as he shares a deep-seated skepticism of climate science and commitment to expanding US oil production.

Hamm’s company, Continental Resources, has benefited from several key policy victories, including the lifting of the 40-year-old crude oil export ban in 2015. This policy shift was likely influenced by Hamm’s relationship with Trump and his work through the Council for a Secure America (CSA), a non-profit organization founded during the Reagan era.

The CSA’s mission statement declares Iran a “looming existential threat,” setting the tone for their advocacy efforts. The organization’s annual reports reveal extensive activity, including 300 briefings with lawmakers and staff over two years, dozens of high-level discussions with security experts, and off-the-record meetings with global dignitaries. These behind-closed-doors encounters have likely shaped US policy on Iran and energy markets.

Critics argue that the CSA’s work is akin to lobbying under the guise of education and awareness-raising. The organization’s executive director maintains that they don’t lobby for or against military actions, but instead focus on “educating” lawmakers about the strategic importance of US energy security. However, this line between education and advocacy is perilously thin.

Hamm’s hardline views on Iran have likely contributed to Trump’s hawkish stance on the country, while his role in shaping US energy policy has seen the administration push for increased oil production despite climate implications. The consequences of Hamm’s influence are multifaceted, contributing to a more volatile Middle East and emboldening Trump to pursue an energy policy that prioritizes fossil fuels over climate action.

The significance of Hamm’s role cannot be overstated. He has become an integral part of the machinery driving US foreign and domestic policy. As the world watches what comes next in this saga, it is clear that Harold Hamm’s fingerprints will continue to leave their mark on the global stage.

In reality, Hamm’s influence is not unique; he is part of a systemic problem that allows a small group of individuals to shape the course of history. The question now is: how can we hold accountable those who wield such power?